SMASH! The Salford medication safety dashboard

Richard Williams, Richard Keers, Wouter T. Gude, Mark Jeffries, Colin Davies, Benjamin Brown, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Anthony J. Avery, Darren M. Ashcroft, Niels Peek


Background: Patient safety is vital to well-functioning health systems. A key component is safe prescribing, particularly in primary care where most medications are prescribed. Previous research demonstrated that the number of patients exposed to potentially hazardous prescribing can be reduced by interrogating the electronic health record (EHR) database of general practices and providing feedback to general practitioners in a pharmacist-led intervention. We aimed to develop and roll out an online dashboard application that delivers this audit and feedback intervention in a continuous fashion.

Method: Based on initial system requirements we designed the dashboard’s user interface over 3 iterations with 6 general practitioners (GPs), 7 pharmacists and a member of the public. Prescribing safety indicators from previous work were implemented in the dashboard. Pharmacists were trained to use the intervention and deliver it to general practices.

Results: A web-based electronic dashboard was developed and linked to shared care records in Salford, UK. The completed dashboard was deployed in all but one (n=43) general practices in the region. By November 2017, 36 pharmacists had been trained in delivering the intervention to practices. There were 135 registered users of the dashboard, with an average of 91 user sessions a week.

Conclusion: We have developed and successfully rolled out of a complex, pharmacist-led dashboard intervention in Salford, UK. System usage statistics indicate broad and sustained uptake of the intervention. The use of systems that provide regularly updated audit information may be an important contributor towards medication safety in primary care



Patient safety; drug prescriptions; electronic audit & feedback; dashboard

Full Text:



Morello RT, Lowthian JA, Barker AL, McGinnes R, Dunt D and Brand C. Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety [Internet] 2013;22(1):11–8. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Parand A, Dopson S, Renz A and Vincent C. The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open [Internet] 2014;4(9):e005055. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Weaver SJ, Lubomksi LH, Wilson RF, Pfoh ER, Martinez KA and Dy SM. Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy. Annals of Internal Medicine [Internet] 2013;158(5_Part_2):369. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Starfield B, Shi L and Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Quarterly [Internet] 2005;83(3):457–502. Accessed November 2017.

Spencer R and Campbell SM. Tools for primary care patient safety: a narrative review. BMC Family Practice [Internet] 2014;15:166. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Stokes J, Panagioti M, Alam R, Checkland K, Cheraghi-Sohi S and Bower P. Effectiveness of case management for ‘at risk’ patients in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet] 2015;10(7):e0132340. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Avery AJ, Ghaleb M, Barber N, Dean Franklin B, Armstrong SJ, Serumaga B, et al. The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. British Journal of General Practice [Internet] 2013;63(613):e543–53. Available from: Accessed September 2017.

Winterstein AG, Sauer BC, Hepler CD and Poole C. Preventable drug-related hospital admissions. Annals of Pharmacotherapy [Internet] 2002;36(7–8):1238–48. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ [Internet] 2004;329(7456):15–9. Available from: Accessed September 2017.

Bates DW and Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. The New England Journal of Medicine [Internet] 2003;348(25):2526–34. Available from: papers3://publication/uuid/5605FBB5-3753-444A-9CEF-50D49AC8C85D.

Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC and Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs [Internet] 2011;30(3):464–71. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Waitman LR, Phillips IE, McCoy AB, Danciu I, Robert M, Halpenny MS, et al. Adopting real-time surveillance dashboards as a component of an enterprisewide medication safety strategy. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety [Internet] 2011;37(7):326–32. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Ash JS, Berg M and Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association [Internet] 2004;11(2):104–12. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localia AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA [Internet] 2005;293(10):1197. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Schedlbauer A, Prasad V, Mulvaney C, Phansalkar S, Stanton W, Bates DW, et al. What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians’ prescribing behavior? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16(4):531–8.

Hsieh TC, Kuperman GJ, Jaggi T, Hojnowski-Diaz P, Fiskio J, Williams DH, et al. Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association [Internet] 2004;11(6):482–91. Available from: Accessed October 2017.

Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, Aronson MD, Davis RB and Phillips RS. Physicians’ decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Archives of Internal Medicine [Internet] 2003 ;163(21):2625. Available from: Accessed October 2017.

Brehaut JC and Eva KW. Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implementation Science [Internet] 2012;114. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Tuti T, Nzinga J, Njoroge M, Brown B, Peek N, English M, et al. A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory. Implementation Science [Internet] 2017;12(1):61. Available from:

Dowding D, Randell R, Gardner P, Fitzpatrick G, Dykes P, Favela J, et al. Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics [Internet] 2015;84(2):87–100.

Khalil H, Bell B, Chambers H, Sheikh A and Aj A. Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017;10.

Ivers N, Barnsley J, Upshur R, Tu K, Shah B, Grimshaw J, et al. My approach to this job is. One person at a time: perceived discordance between population-level quality targets and patient-centred care. Canadian Family Physician [Internet] 2014;60(3):258–66. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Sadler S, Rodgers S, Howard R, Morris CJ and Avery AJ. Training pharmacists to deliver a complex information technology intervention (PINCER) using the principles of educational outreach and root cause analysis. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice [Internet] 2014;22(1):47–58. Available from: Accessed November 2017.

Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, Armstrong S, Cresswell K, Eden M, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-eff ectiveness analysis. Lancet [Internet] 2012;379(9823):1310–9.

Elliott RA, Putman KD, Franklin M, Annemans L, Verhaeghe N, Eden M, et al. Cost effectiveness of a pharmacist-led information technology intervention for reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices (PINCER). Pharmacoeconomics [Internet] 2014;32(6):573–90. Available from: Accessed October 2017.

Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. In: Ivers N (Ed.), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet] Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. Accessed November 2017.

Akbarov A, Kontopantelis E, Sperrin M, Stocks SJ, Williams R, Rodgers S, et al. Primary care medication safety surveillance with integrated primary and secondary care electronic health records: a cross-sectional study. Drug Safety [Internet] 2015;38(7):671–82. Available from:

Spencer R, Bell B, Avery AJ, Gookey G and Campbell SM. Identification of an updated set of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs. British Journal of General Practice [Internet] 2014; 64(621):e181–90. Available from: Accessed December 2017.

Williams R, Kontopantelis E, Buchan I and Peek N. Clinical code set engineering for reusing EHR data for research: a review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics [Internet] 2017;70:1–13. Available from: Accessed May 2017.

Keers RN, Williams R, Davies C, Peek N and Ashcroft DM. Improving medication safety in primary care: developing a stakeholder-centred electronic prescribing safety indicator dashboard. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2015.

Google. AngularJS javascript MVW framework [Internet] 2015. Available from: Accessed 19 December 2017.

Node.js [Internet]. Available from: Accessed 19 December 2017.

Express. Express – Node.js web application framework [Internet] 2013. Available from: Accessed 19 December 2017.

MongoDB. MongoDB [Internet] 2017. Available from: Accessed 19 December 2017.

Williams R, Brown B, Peek N and Buchan I. Making medication data meaningful: illustrated with hypertension. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics [Internet] 2016;228:247–51. Available from: Accessed October 2016.

Lainer M, Mann E and Sonnichsen A. Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care [Internet] 2013;25(5):590–8. Available from:

Dreischulte T, Donnan P, Grant A, Hapca A, McCowan C and Guthrie B. Safer prescribing — a trial of education, informatics, and financial incentives. The New England Journal of Medicine [Internet] 2016;374(11):1053–64. Available from: Accessed December 2017.

Ammenwerth E, Aly AF, Bürkle T, Christ P, Dormann H, Friesdorf W, et al. Memorandum on the use of information technology to improve medication safety. Methods of Information in Medicine 2014;53(5):336–43.

Brehaut JC, Colquhoun HL, Eva KW, Carroll K, Sales A, Michie S, et al. Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness. Annals of Internal Medicine [Internet] 2016;164(6):435–41. Available from: Accessed December 2017.

Vincent CA, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient? Quality and Safety in Health Care [Internet] 2002;11:76–80. Available from: Accessed 19 October 2017.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT