The characteristics and capabilities of the available open source health information technologies supporting healthcare: A scoping review protocol

Ather Akhlaq, Brian McKinstry, Aziz Sheikh

Abstract


INTRODUCTION: Due to the many advantages of open source software (OSS), including reduced cost of licensing, more flexibility in terms of customisation and redistribution, better quality and no vendor lock-in, OSS in healthcare is increasingly gaining importance. Various open source health information technologies (OS-HITs) are continuously being designed and developed for different areas of healthcare to increase organisational efficiencies and quality of care at minimum costs. The objective of this scoping review is to identify the kinds of existing OS-HITs, their characteristics (e.g. functions) and capabilities (e.g. advantages/disadvantages) for various healthcare stakeholders (physicians and patients) and healthcare sectors (e.g. clinical, administrative).

METHODS: We will conduct a scoping review to identify the range of available OS-HITs in international literature from 1980 to September 2018. Searches will be conducted in six major international databases, namely: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, Excerpta Medica Database, Global Health, Library Information Science and Technology Abstracts, Medline and Web of Science to identify relevant published research. We will also search the Google search engine and Google Scholar for on-going and unpublished work and the grey literature. Searches will be peer-reviewed by two independent reviewers and will not be limited by methodology or language. Next, selected references will be tabulated for study characteristics by author affiliation, country of origin, the name of OS-HIT, healthcare area/sector, system requirements, stakeholders, complete solution and web link. Furthermore, functions, benefits/advantages, disadvantages and outcomes (e.g. usability) of OS-HITs will be extracted. Narrative and interpretative synthesis of data will be undertaken.

RESULTS: We will report our findings in a peer-reviewed journal.


Keywords


health information technology; open source; scoping review

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


OpenSource. What is open source? 2017. Available from: https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-source. Accessed 23 April 2017.

Webster PC. The rise of open-source electronic health records. The Lancet 2011;377(9778):1641–2.

Goulde M, Holt M. Open Source Software: A Primer for Health Care Leaders. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation, 2006.

Janamanchi B, Katsamakas E, Raghupathi W, Gao W. The state and profile of open source software projects in health and medical informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78(7):457–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.02.006. PMid:19321384.

Costa C, Ferreira C, Bastião L, Ribeiro L, Silva A, Oliveira JL. Dicoogle-an open source peer-to-peer PACS. Journal of Digital Imaging 2011;24(5):848–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9347-9. PMid:20981467; PMCid:PMC3180530.

Aminpour F, Sadoughi F, Ahamdi M. Utilization of open source electronic health record around the world: a systematic review. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2014;19(1):57.

Karopka T, Schmuhl H, Demski H. Free/libre open source software in health care: a review. Healthcare Informatics Research 2014;20(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2014.20.1.11. PMid:24627814; PMCid:PMC3950260.

Alvarez LR, Solis RCV. DICOM RIS/PACS telemedicine network implementation using free open source software. IEEE Latin America Transactions 2013;11(1):168–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2013.6502797.

WorldVistA. Open Source VistA Platform. 2017. Available from: http://worldvista.org/AboutVistA/copy2_of_index_html. Accessed 23 November 2017.

NHS E. Code4Health. 2017. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/digitaltechnology/info-revolution/code4health. Accessed 29 April 2017

Protecode SCCa. Healthcare Driven by Open Source Software. 2015. Available from: http://rippleosi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/e-HealthWhitepaper-SCC.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2017.

Code4Health. Welcome to Code4Health™. 2017. Available from: https://code4health.org. Accessed 29 April 2017.

Goldwater JC, Muckle A. A study and report on open source health information technology systems. 2011. Available from: https://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/oscon2011/public/schedule/detail/19019

GatePoint. Pulse Report: Healthcare IT Trends and Red Hat. 2014. Available from: https://www.redhat.com/en/resources/pulse-report-healthcare-it-trends-and-red-hat. Accessed 4 June 2017.

World Health Organization. Compendium of Innovative Health Technologies for Low-Resource Settings: Assistive Devices, eHealth Solutions, Medical Devices. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2014.

Kalis B. The time is now for open innovation in healthcare Accenture. 2016. Available from: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/blogs/blogs-time-now-open-innovation-healthcare. Accessed 10 July 2017.

Neil A. Health and the cloud: supporting chief clinical information officers in a digital-first era. UK Principal Solution Specialist, 2016. Available from: https://enterprise.microsoft.com/en-gb/articles/industries/public-sector/health/health-and-the-cloud-supporting-chief-clinical-information-officers-in-a-digital-first-era. Accessed August 2017.

techUK. Digitising the NHS by 2018 - One Year On 2014. Available from: http://jac.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Digitising_the_NHS_-_One_Year_On.pdf. Accessed August 2017.

Neiman J. OpenMRS Ebola Case Study: OpenMRS. 2016. Available from: http://openmrs.org/2016/08/openmrs-ebola-case-study. Accessed 11 June 2017.

Fitzgerald F, Wing K, Naveed A, Gbessay M, Ross J, Checchi F, et al. Risk in the ‘Red Zone’: outcomes for children admitted to Ebola holding units in Sierra Leone without Ebola virus disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2017;65(1):162–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix223. PMid:28369236; PMCid:PMC5693324.

Usa M. Wired: Google Builds a New Tablet for the Fight Against Ebola 2015. Available from: http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/article/wired-google-builds-new-tablet-fight-against-ebola. Accessed 12 July 2017.

Aminpour F, Sadoughi F, Ahamdi M. Utilization of open source electronic health record around the world: a systematic review. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2014;19(1):57–64. PMid:24672566; PMCid:PMC3963324.

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.

Mays N, Roberts E, Popay J. Synthesising research evidence. Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services. Research Methods 2001;188–220.

Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009;46(10):1386–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010. PMid:19328488.

Daudt HM, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48. PMid:23522333; PMCid:PMC3614526.

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 2010;5(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. PMid:20854677; PMCid:PMC2954944.

Akhlaq A, Sheikh A, Pagliari C. Defining health information exchange: scoping review of published definitions. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics 2017;23(4):684–764. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i4.838.

Akhlaq A, Sheikh A, Pagliari C. Health information exchange as a complex and adaptive construct: scoping review. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics 2017;23(4):633–83. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i4.889. PMid:28346129.

Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy Systems 2008;6(7):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-6-7

Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Hanan K, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2015.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ: British Medical Journal 2015;349.

McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016;75:40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. PMid:27005575.

OSI. History of the OSI 2017. Available from: https://opensource.org/history. Accessed 11 April 2017.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v25i4.1022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT