Exploring weight loss services in primary care and staff views on using a web-based programme

Lisa J Ware, Sarah Williams, Katherine Bradbury, Catherine Brant, Paul Little, FD Richard Hobbs, Lucy Yardley

Abstract


Background Demand is increasing for primary care to deliver effective weight management services to patients, but research suggests that staff feel inadequately resourced for such a role. Supporting service delivery with a free and effective web-based weight management programme could maximise primary care resource and provide cost-effective support for patients. However, integration of ehealth into primary care may face challenges.

Objectives To explore primary care staff experiences of delivering weight management services and their perceptions of a web-based weight management programme to aid service delivery.

Methods Focus groups were conducted with primary care physicians, nurses and healthcare assistants (n = 36) involved in delivering weight loss services. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results Participants thought that primary care should be involved in delivering weight management, especially when weight was aggravating health problems. However, they felt under-resourced to deliver these services and unsure as to the effectiveness of their input, as routine services were not evaluated. Beliefs that current services were ineffective resulted in staff reluctance to allocate more resources. Participants were hopeful that supplementing practice with a web-based weight management programme would enhance patient services and promote service evaluation.

Conclusions Although primary care staff felt they should deliver weight loss services, low levels of faith in the efficacy of current treatments resulted in provision of under-resourced and ‘ad hoc’ services. Integration of a web-based weight loss programme that promotes service evaluation and provides a cost-effective option for supporting patients may encourage practices to invest more in weight management services.


Keywords


health services research; internet; lifestyle change; obesity; primary care

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHOMedia Center. Obesity and Overweight. Fact sheet 311. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011 [updated March 2011 and 4 June 2012]. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ (accessed 4 June 2012).

Mercer S. How useful are clinical guidelines for the management of obesity in general practice? British Journal of General Practice 2009;59(568):863–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X472917

PMid:19861030 PMCid:PMC2765838

Huang J, Yu H, Marin E, Brock S, CardenDand Davis T. Physicians' weight loss counseling in two public hospital primary care clinics. Academic Medicine 2004;79:156–61.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200402000-00012

PMid:14744717

Brown I, Stride C, Psarou A, Brewins L and Thompson J. Management of obesity in primary care: nurses' practices, beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007;59:329–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04297.x

PMid:17635298

Scott JG, Cohen D, DiCicco-Bloom B et al. Speaking of weight: how patients and primary care clinicians initiate weight loss counseling. Preventive Medicine 2004;38:819–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.001

PMid:15193904

Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP et al. Primary care physicians' attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obesity 2003;11:1168–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2003.161

PMid:14569041

Orleans CT, George LK, Houpt JL and Brodie KH. Health promotion in primary care: a survey of US family practitioners. Preventive Medicine 1985;14:636–47.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(85)90083-0

Tsai A and Wadden T. Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2009;24:1073–9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1042-5

PMid:19562419 PMCid:PMC2726879

McQuigg M, Brown J, Broom J et al. Empowering primary care to tackle the obesity epidemic: the Counterweight Programme. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;59(Suppl 1):S93–100; discussion S1.

McQuigg M, Brown JE, Broom JI et al. Engaging patients, clinicians and health funders in weight management: the Counterweight Programme. Family Practice 2008;25(Suppl 1):i79–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn081

PMid:19042914

Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, EmmonsKM and Gillman MW. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 2010; 18:308–13.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.242

PMid:19696764 PMCid:PMC3710670

Brandt V, Brandt CJ, Glintborg D, Arendal C, Toubro S and Brandt K. Sustained weight loss during 20 months using a personalized interactive Internet-based dietician advice program in a general practice setting. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences 2011; 3(1,2):23–8.

McTigue KM, Conroy MB, Hess R et al. Using the Internet to translate an evidence-based lifestyle intervention into practice. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2009;15:851–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0036

PMid:19919191

Giordano R, Clark M and Goodwin N. Perspectives on telehealth and telecare. Learning from the 12 Whole System Demonstrator Action Network (WSDAN) sites, 2011. www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/articles/th_perspectives.html.

Murray E, May C and Mair F. Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT). BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2010;10:61.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-61

PMid:20955594 PMCid:PMC2967499

Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L and Michie S. Using the Internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2010;12(1):e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1376

PMid:20164043 PMCid:PMC2836773

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991;50:179–211.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Yardley L, Williams S, Bradbury K et al. Integrating user perspectives into the development of a web-based weight management intervention. Clinical Obesity 2012;2(5–6):132–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12001

Joffe H and Yardley L. Content and thematic analysis. In: Marks DM and Yardley L (eds) Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London: Sage, 2004.

Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006; 3:77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Strauss A and Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2e). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1998. Glaser BG and Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

Aucott LS, Riddell RE and Smith WCS. Attitudes of general practitioner registrars and their trainers toward obesity prevention in adults. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2011;2:181–6.

Hwang OK, Stuckey LH, Chen CM et al. Primary care providers' perspectives on online weight-loss programs: a big wish list. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1955

PMid:22262726

House of Commons Health Committee. Obesity: third report of session 2003–04. London: The Stationery Office, 2004.

National Audit Office. Tackling Obesity in England: report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: The Stationery Office, 2001.

McTigue KM, Bhargava T, Bryce CL et al. Patient perspectives on the integration of an intensive online behavioral weight loss intervention into primary care. Patient Education and Counseling 2011;83:261–4.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.009

PMid:21459256




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i4.18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT