Designing Patient-facing Health Information Technologies for the Outpatient Settings: A Literature Review

Yushi Yang, Onur Asan

Abstract


 

Introduction: The implementation of health information technologies (HITs) has changed the dynamics of doctor–patient communication in outpatient settings. Designing patient-facing HITs provides patients with easy access to healthcare information during the visit and has the potential to enhance the patient-centred care.

 

Objectives: The objectives of this study are to systematically review how the designs of patient-facing HITs have been suggested and evaluated, and how they may potentially affect the doctor–patient communication and patient-centred care.

 

Method: We conducted an online database search to identify articles published before December 2014 relevant to the objectives of this study. A total of nine papers have been identified and reviewed in this study.

 

Results: Designing patient-facing HITs is at an early stage. The current literature has been exploring the impact of HITs on doctor–patient communication dynamics. Based on the findings of these studies, there is an emergent need to design more patient-centred HITs. There are also some papers that focus on the usability evaluation of some preliminary prototypes of the patient-facing HITs. The design styles of patient-facing HITs included sharing the health information with the patients on: (1) a separate patient display, (2) a projector, (3) a portable tablet, (4) a touch-based screen and (5) a shared computer display that can be viewed by both doctors and patients. Each of them had the strengths and limitations to facilitate the patient-centred care, and it is worthwhile to make a comparison of them in order to identify future research directions.

 

Conclusion: The designs of patient-facing HITs in outpatient settings are promising in facilitating the doctor-patient communication and patient engagement. However, their effectiveness and usefulness need to be further evaluated and improved from a systems perspective.

 


Keywords


Patent-facing HIT; Screen Sharing; EHR; Macroergonomics

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Barello S, Graffigna G and Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nursing Research and Practice 2012;2012:7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/905934. PMid:23213497; PMCid:PMC3504449.

Beck RS, Daughtridge R and Sloane PD. Physician–patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice/American Board of Family Practice 2002;15(1):25–38.

Ong LM, De Haes JC, Hoos AM and Lammes FB. Doctorpatient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine 1995;40(7):903–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-M.

Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995;152(9):1423–33. PMid:7728691; PMCid:PMC1337906.

Kravitz RL and Melnikow J. Engaging patients in medical decision making: the end is worthwhile, but the means need to be more practical. British Medical Journal 2001;323(7313):584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.584. PMid:11557690; PMCid:PMC1121170.

White A and Danis M. Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. The Journal of the American Medical Association 2013;309(22):2327-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6030. PMid:23757080.

Street RLJ, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E and Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care 2005;43(10):960–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70. PMid:16166865.

Street RL. Communication in medical encounters: an ecological perspective. Handbook of health communication. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 2003:63–89.

Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K, Wang F, Wilson C and Daher C et al. Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003;163(1):83–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.1.83. PMid:12523921.

Roter DL. The outpatient medical encounter and elderly patients. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 2000;16(1):95–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70011-2.

Siminoff LA, Ravdin P, Colabianchi N and Sturm CMS. Doctorpatient communication patterns in breast cancer adjuvant therapy discussions. Health Expectations 2000;3(1):26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00074.x. PMid:11281909.

Kessels RP. Patients’ memory for medical information. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003;96(5):219–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.5.219. PMid:12724430; PMCid:PMC539473.

Bates DW and Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Affairs 2010;29(4):614–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0007. PMid:20368590.

Montague E and Asan O. Dynamic modeling of patient and physician eye gaze to understand the effects of electronic health records on doctor-patient communication and attention. International Journal Of Medical Informatics 2014;83(3):225–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.11.003. PMid:24380671; PMCid:PMC4046907.

Duke P, Frankel RM and Reis S. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: a skills-based approach. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2013;25(4): 358–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.827981. PMid:24112206.

Ueckert F, Goerz M, Ataian M, Tessmann S and Prokosch H-U. Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record. International Journal of Medical Informatics 70(2):99–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00052-2.

Bates DW and Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine 2003;348(25):2526–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa020847. PMid:12815139.

Shachak A, Hadas-Dayagi M, Ziv A and Reis S. Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2009;24(3):341–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0892-6. PMid:19130148; PMCid:PMC2642564.

Bates DW. Getting in step: electronic health records and their role in care coordination. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2010;25(3):174–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1252-x. PMid:20127195; PMCid:PMC2839327.

Irani JS, Middleton JL, Marfatia R, Omana ET and D’Amico F. The use of electronic health records in the exam room and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2009;22(5):553–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080259. PMid:19734402.

Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S and Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician–patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Education And Counseling 2006;61(1):134–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004. PMid:16533682.

Montague E, Xu J, Chen P-y, Asan O, Barrett BP and Chewning B. Modeling eye gaze patterns in clinician–patient interaction with lag sequential analysis. Human factors. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2011;53(5):502–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720811405986.

Noordman J, Verhaak P, van Beljouw I and van Dulmen S. Consulting room computers and their effect on general practitioner – patient communication: comparing two periods of computer use. Family practice 2010:cmq058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq058. PMid:20660530.

Karsh B, Beasley JW and Hagenauer ME. Are electronic medical records associated with improved perceptions of the quality of medical records, working conditions, or quality of working life? Behaviour and Information Technology 2004;23(5):327–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001693845.

Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S and Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician–patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Education and Counseling 2006;61(1):134–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004. PMid:16533682.

Street RL, Liu L, Farber NJ, Chen Y, Calvitti A and Zuest D et al. Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling 2014;96(3):315–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.004. PMid:24882086; PMCid:PMC4339111.

Ahern DK, Woods SS, Lightowler MC, Finley SW and Houston TK. Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011;40(5, Suppl 2):S162–S72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.005. PMid:21521591.

Montague E and Asan O. Physician interactions with electronic health records in primary care. Health Systems. 2012;1(2):96–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/hs.2012.11. PMid:24009982; PMCid:PMC3760434.

Leon M, Doolan DC, Laing R, Malins J and Salman H. Application of interactive surfaces to support computer mediated collaborative design environment. Information Visualisation (IV). 2014;281–6.

Lajoie S and Lu J. Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to coregulation in medicine? Metacognition Learning 2012;7(1):45–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9077-5.

Lau SR, Christensen ST and Andreasen JT. Patients’ preferences for patient-centered communication: a survey from an outpatient department in rural Sierra Leone. Patient Education and Counseling 2013;93(2):312–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.025. PMid:23906648.

Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh B, Gurses A, Alvarado C and Smith M et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2006;15(Suppl 1):i50–i8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015842. PMid:17142610; PMCid:PMC2464868.

Hendrick H and Kleiner B. Macroergonomics An Introduction to Work System Design. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2001.

Shachak A and Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient–doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2009;15(4):641–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01065.x. PMid:19522722.

Kazmi Z. Effects of exam room EHR use on doctor–patient communication: a systematic literature review. Informatics in Primary Care 2013;21(1):30–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i1.37. PMid:24629654.

Prey JE, Woollen J, Wilcox L, Sackeim AD, Hripcsak G and Bakken S et al. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;21(4):742–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141. PMid:24272163; PMCid:PMC4078275.

Cooper HM. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. Sage: California, 1998.

Berg BL and Lune H. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson:Boston, 2004.

Asan O and Montague E. Technology-mediated information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters. Behaviour and Information Technology 2013;33(3):259–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.780636. PMid:26451062; PMCid:PMC4594863.

Chen Y, Ngo V, Harrison S and Duong V. Unpacking Exam-Room Computing: Negotiating Computer-Use In Patient–Physician Interactions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2011;3343–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979438.

Fonville A, Choe EK, Oldham S and Kientz JA. Exploring the Use of Technology in Healthcare Spaces and its Impact on Empathic Communication. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium 2010;497–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1882992.1883071.

Unruh KT, Skeels M, Civan-Hartzler A and Pratt W. Transforming Clinic Environments into Information Workspaces for Patients. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1753354: ACM, 2010; 183–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753354.

Gonzales M and Riek L. A Shared Interface to Improve Oncologist-Patient Communication. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248711.

Ni T, Karlson AK and Wigdor D. AnatOnMe: Facilitating Doctor-Patient Communication Using a Projection-Based Handheld Device. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011;3333–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979437.

Schooley B, San Nicolas-Rocca T and Burkhard R. Patient–Provider Communications in Outpatient Clinic Settings: a Clinic-Based Evaluation of Mobile Device and Multimedia Mediated Communications for Patient Education. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2015;3(1):e2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3732. PMid:25583145; PMCid:PMC4319142.

Wilcox L, Morris D, Tan D and Gatewood J. Designing Patient-Centric Information Displays for Hospitals. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010:2123–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753650.

Piper A and Hollan J. Supporting medical communication for older patients with a shared touch-screen computer. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2013;82(11):e242–e50.

Ahern DK, Woods SS, Lightowler MC, Finley SW and Houston TK. Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S162–72.

Montague E, Asan O. Dynamic modeling of patient and physician eye gaze to understand the effects of electronic health records on doctor–patient communication and attention. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2014;83(3):225–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.11.003. PMid:24380671; PMCid:PMC4046907.

Carayon P. Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Applied Ergonomics 2006;37(4):525–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.011. PMid:16756937

Ant Ozok A, Wu H, Garrido M, Pronovost PJ and Gurses AP. Usability and perceived usefulness of Personal Health Records for preventive health care: a case study focusing on patients’ and primary care providers’ perspectives. Applied Ergonomics 2014;45(3):613–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.09.005. PMid:24119975.

Waterson P. Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: a progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS). Applied Ergonomics 2014;45(2, Part A):150–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.004. PMid:23895916.

Asan O, Carayon P, Beasley JW and Montague E. Work system factors influencing physicians’ screen sharing behaviors in primary care encounters. International Journal of Medical Informatics.Epub ahead of print.

Kumarapeli P and de Lusignan S. Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20(E1):E67–E75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001081. PMid:23242763; PMCid:PMC3715353.

Caine K, Kohn S, Lawrence C, Hanania R, Meslin E and Tierney W. Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from patient interviews. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2015;30(1):7–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3049-9. PMid:25480719; PMCid:PMC4265225.

Karsh B. Meso-ergonomics: a new paradigm for macroergonomics research. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association, 2006.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i1.185

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT