How does Canada stack up? A bibliometric analysis of the primary healthcare electronic medical record literature

Amanda L Terry, Moira Stewart, Martin Fortin, Sabrina T Wong, Maureen Kennedy, Fred Burge, Richard Birtwhistle, Inese Grava-Gubins, Greg Webster, Amardeep Thind

Abstract


Background Major initiatives are underway in Canada which are designed to increase electronic medical record (EMR) implementation and maximise its use in primary health care. These developments need to be supported by sufficient evidence from the literature, particularly relevant research conducted in the Canadian context.

Objectives This study sought to quantify this lack of research by: (1) identifying and describing the primary health care EMR literature; and (2) comparing the Canadian and international primary healthcare EMR literature on the basis of content and publication levels.

Methods Seven bibliographic databases were searched using primary health care and EMR keywords. Publication abstracts were reviewed and categorised. First author affiliation was used to identify country of origin. Proportions of Canadian- and non-Canadian-authored publications were compared using Fisher’s exact test. For countries having 10 or more primary healthcare EMR publications, publications per 10 000 researchers were calculated.

Results After exclusions, 750 publications were identified. More than one-third used primary healthcare EMRs as a study data source. Twenty-two (3%) were Canadian-authored. There were significantly different publication levels in three categories between Canadian- and non-Canadian-authored publications. Based on publications per researchers, the Netherlands ranked first, while Canada ranked eighth of nine countries with 10 or more publications.

Conclusions A relatively small body of literature focused on EMRs in primary health care exists; publications by Canadian authors were low. This study highlights the need to develop a strong evidence base to support the effective implementation


Full Text:

PDF

References


Schoen C, Osborn R, SquiresDet al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2012;31:2805–16.

Canada Health Infoway. Infoway invests $380 million to help physicians and nurse practitioners implement electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Press release, 02/09/2011. www.infoway-inforoute.ca/index.php/newsmedia/2011-news-releases/infoway-invests-380-millionto-help-physicians-and-nurse-practitioners-implementelectronic-medical-record-emr-systems

Lau F, Price M, Boyd J, Partridge C, Bell H and Raworth R. Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012;12:10.

Moorman PW, Schuemie MJ and van der Lei J. An inventory of publications on electronic medical records revisited. Methods of Information in Medicine 2009; 48:454–8.

Wen HC, Ho YS, Jian WS, Li HC and Hsu YH. Scientific production of electronic health record research, 1991–2005. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2007;86:191–6.

Wen HC, Ho YS, Jian WS, Li HC and Hsu YH. Scientific production of electronic health record research, 1991–2005. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2007;86:191–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.02.002 PMid:17400328

Ovhed I, van Royen P and Hakansson A. What is the future of primary care research? Probably fairly bright, if we may believe the historical development. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2005;23:248–53.

Mendis K, Kidd MR, Schattner P and Canalese J. A bibliometric analysis of Australian general practice publications from 1980 to 2007 using PubMed. Informatics in Primary Care 2011;18:223–33.

Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C and Vanasse A. Multimorbidity is common to family practice: is it commonly researched? Canadian Family Physician 2005;51:244–5.

Glanville J, Kendrick T, McNally R, Campbell J and Hobbs FD. Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis. BMJ 2011;342:d1028.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD.StatExtracts. http://stats.oecd.org/

Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B and Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2008;15:729–36.

Shachak A and Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2009;15:641–9.

Kumarapeli P and de Lusignan S. Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20:e67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001081 PMid:23242763

Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthcare Quarterly 2007;10:107–16.

Devlies J, Walossek U, Artmann J, Giest S and Dumortier J. eHealth Strategies. Country Brief: Belgium. European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, ICT for Health Unit, 2010. http://ehealthstrategies.eu/database/documents/Belgium_CountryBrief_eHStrategies.pdf

Shackak A, Hadas-Dayagi M, Ziv A and Reis S. Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2009;24:341–8.

Schoen C, Osborn R, DotyMMet al.Asurvey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. Health Affairs 2009; 28(6):w1171–83.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i4.2

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT