The impact of interoperability of electronic health records on ambulatory physician practices: a discrete-event simulation study

Yuan Zhou, Jessica S Ancker, Mandar Upahdye, Nicolette M McGeorge, Theresa K Guarrera, Sudeep Hedge, Peter W Crane, Rollin J Fairbanks, Ann M Bisantz, Rainu Kaushal, Li Lin

Abstract


Background The effect of health information technology (HIT) on efficiency and workload among clinical and nonclinical staff has been debated, with conflicting evidence about whether electronic health records (EHRs) increase or decrease effort. None of this paper to date, however, examines the effect of interoperability quantitatively using discrete event simulation techniques.

Objective To estimate the impact of EHR systems with various levels of interoperability on day-to-day tasks and operations of ambulatory physician offices.

Methods Interviews and observations were used to collect workflow data from 12 adult primary and specialty practices. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to represent patient flows and clinical and administrative tasks of physicians and staff members.

Results High levels of EHR interoperability were associated with reduced time spent by providers on four tasks: preparing lab reports, requesting lab orders, prescribing medications, and writing referrals. The implementation of an EHR was associated with less time spent by administrators but more time spent by physicians, compared with time spent at paper-based practices. In addition, the presence of EHRs and of interoperability did not significantly affect the time usage of registered nurses or the total visit time and waiting time of patients.

Conclusion This paper suggests that the impact of using HIT on clinical and nonclinical staff work efficiency varies, however, overall it appears to improve time efficiency more for administrators than for physicians and nurses.


Keywords


electronic health record (EHR); interoperability; computer simulation; physician practice

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Oracle Corporation. Interoperability: A Key to Meaningful Use. Oracle 2010. http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/healthcare/interoperability-wp-188782.pdf.

Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC and Cai B. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2011. NCHS Data Brief 2011;(79):1–8.

Dobrev A, Stroetmann KA, Stroetmann VN et al. The conceptual framework of interoperable electronic health record and ePrescribing systems. EHR Impact 2008. http://www.ehr-impact.eu/downloads/documents/EHRI_D1_2_Conceptual_framework_v1_0.pdf

Lee J, Cain C, Young S, Chockley N and Burstin H. The adoption gap: health information technology in small physician practices. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1364–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1364. PMid:16162585.

Zheng K, Haftel HM, Hirschl RB, O’Reilly M and Hanauer DA. Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010;17(4):454–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.004440. PMid:20595314; PMCid:PMC2995654.

Miller RH and Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2004;23(2):116–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116.

Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R and Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005;12(5):505–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1700. PMid:15905487; PMCid:PMC1205599

Yan H, Gardner R and Baier R. Beyond the focus group: understanding physicians’ barriers to electronic medical records. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2012;38(4):184–91. PMid:22533131.

Audet AM, Doty MM, Peugh J, Shamasdin J, Zapert K and Schoenbaum S. Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians’ black bags? Medscape General Medicine 2004;6(4):2. PMid:15775829; PMCid:PMC1480565.

Liebhaber A and Grossman JM. Physicians moving to midsized, single-specialty practices. Track Report 2007(18):1.

Lohr S. How to make electronic medical records a reality. The New York Times 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/business/01unbox.html

Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, Sim I and Ganchoff C. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1127–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1127. PMid:16162555.

McGeorge NM, Hegde S, Guarrera TK, Zhou Y, Lin L, Crane PW et al. Studying the impact of interoperable electronic health records on workflow in ambulatory care. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2013 (in preparation).

Guarrera TK, McGeorge NM, Ancker JS, Hegde S, Zhou Y, Lin L et al. Characterizing the effect of interoperability on healthcare work: a novel framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics 2012 (in preparation).

Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW and Middleton B. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2005;(Suppl): W5-10–W5-18.

Garde S, Knaup P, Hovenga EJS and Heard S. Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records-domain knowledge governance for openEHR archetypes. Methods of Information in Medicine 2007;46(3):332–43.

Lewis GA, Morris E, Simanta S, Wrage L (Eds). Why standards are not enough to guarantee end-to-end interoperability. Seventh International Conference on Composition Based Software Systems. ICCBSS 2008 (Feb 25–29, 2008). 164–73.

Brailer DJ. Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2005;(Suppl):W5-19–W5-21.

Jun J, Jacobson S and Swisher J. Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: a survey. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 1999;50(2):109–23.

Côté MJ. Patient flow and resource utilization in an outpatient clinic. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 1999;33(3):231–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00007-5.

Law AM and Kelton WD. Simulation modeling and analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

Kelton WD, Sadowski RP and Sadowski DA. Simulation with ARENA. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 2002.

Lorenzi N, Kouroubali A, Detmer D and Bloomrosen M. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2009;9(1):15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-15. PMid:19236705; PMCid:PMC2662829.

Samaan ZM, Klein MD, Mansour ME and DeWitt TG. The impact of the electronic health record on an academic pediatric primary care center. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2009;32(3):180–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181ac9667. PMid:19542807.

Overhage JM, Perkins S, Tierney WM and McDonald CJ. Controlled trial of direct physician order entry effects on physicians’ time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001;8(4):361–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2001.0080361

Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, Honour MM, Gupta S, Wang S et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005;38(3):176–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009. PMid:15896691.

Lo HG, Newmark LP, Yoon C, Volk LA, Carlson VL, Kittler AF et al. Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14(5):609–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2318. PMid:17600102 PMCid:PMC1975804

Grieger DL, Cohen SH and Krusch DA. A pilot study to document the return on investment for implementing an ambulatory electronic health record at an academic medical center. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2007;205(1):89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.074. PMid:17617337.

Swisher JR, Jacobson SH, Jun JB and Balci O. Modeling and analyzing a physician clinic environment using discrete-event (visual) simulation. Computers & Operations Research 2001; 28(2):105–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00093-3.

Lee Y and Elcan A. Simulation modeling for process reengineering in the telecommunications industry. Interfaces 1996;26(3):1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.26.3.1.

Kumar K. Technology for supporting supply chain management: introduction. Communications of the ACM 2001;44(6):58–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/376134.376165.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i1.36

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT