Bottom-up and middle-out approaches to electronic patient information systems: a focus on healthcare pathways

Ken Eason, Mike Dent, Patrick Waterson, Dylan Tutt, Andrew Thornett

Abstract


Background A study is reported that examines the use of electronic health record (EHR) systems in two UK local health communities.

Objective These systems were developed locally and the aim of the study was to explore how well they were supporting the coordination of care along healthcare pathways that cross the organisational boundaries between the agencies delivering health care.

Results The paper presents the findings for two healthcare pathways; the Stroke Pathway and a pathway for the care of the frail elderly in their own homes. All the pathways examined involved multiple agencies and many locally tailored EHR systems are in use to aid the coordination of care. However, the ability to share electronic patient information along the pathways was patchy. The development of systems that enabled effective sharing of information was characterised by sociotechnical system development, i.e. associating the technical development with process changes and organisational changes, with local development teams that drew on all the relevant agencies in the local health community and on evolutionary development, as experience grew of the benefits that EHR systems could deliver.

Conclusions The study concludes that whilst there may be a role for a national IT strategy, for example, to set standards for systems procurement that facilitate data interchange, most systems development work needs to be done at a ‘middle-out’ level in the local health community, where joint planning between healthcare agencies can occur, and at the local healthcare pathway level where systems can be matched to specific needs for information sharing.


Keywords


electronic health records (EHRs); frail elderly, healthcare pathways; local design; local health communities; sociotechnical systems design; stroke

Full Text:

PDF

References


Eason KD. Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS national programme for information technology. Journal of Information Technology 2007;22:257–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000101

National Audit Office. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: progress since 2006. National Audit Office: London, 2008. www.nao.org.uk/pn/07-08/0708484.htm

Cresswell K and Sheikh A. The NHS Care Record Service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):153–60. PMid:20074427

Herbert I and de Lusignan S. Further changes are needed if the National Care Record Service (NCRS) implementation is to succeed. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):161–4. PMid:20074428

Eason K, Dent M, Waterson P, Tutt D, Hurd P and Thornett A. Getting the Benefit from Electronic Patient Information that Crosses Organisational Boundaries. Final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2011.

Allen D. From boundary concept to boundary object: The practice and politics of care pathway development. Social Science & Medicine 2009;69:354–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.002 PMid:19481321

de Luc K. Are different models of care pathways being developed? International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2000;13(2):80–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09526860010319532

Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. Department of Health: London, 2007.

Department of Health. Delivering Care Closer to Home: meeting the challenge. Department of Health: London, 2008.

Sternberg SA, Wershof Schwartz A, Karunananthan S, Bergman H and Mark Clarfield A. The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2011;59(11):2129–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x PMid:22091630

Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001;64(2–3):143–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00200-3

Ellis B. Complexity in practice: understanding primary care as a complex adaptive system. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(2):135–40. PMid:21078236

de Lusignan S and Krause P. The Hayes principles: learning from the national pilot of information technology and core generalisable theory in informatics. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(2):73–7. PMid:21078229

Hayes G. The NHS Information Technology (IT) and Social Care Review 2009: a synopsis. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(2):81–8. PMid:21078230

de Lusignan S and Krause P. Liberating the NHS: an information revolution – think beyond the electronic patient record, think service orientated architecture! Informatics in Primary Care 2011;18(3):147–8.

Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T et al. The Devil's in the Detail: final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and HealthSpace programmes. London: University College London, 2010.

Coiera E. Building a national health IT system from the middle out. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16:271–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3183 PMid:19407078 PMCid:PMC2732241




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i1.47

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT