Approaches and challenges to optimising primary care teams’ electronic health record usage

Nancy Pandhi, Wan-Lin Yang, Zaher Karp, Alexander Young, John W. Beasley, Sally Kraft, Pascale Carayon

Abstract


Background Although the presence of an electronic health record (EHR) alone does not ensure high quality, efficient care, few studies have focused on the work of those charged with optimising use of existing EHR functionality.

Objective To examine the approaches used and challenges perceived by analysts supporting the optimisation of primary care teams’ EHR use at a large U.S. academic health care system.

Methods A qualitative study was conducted. Optimisation analysts and their supervisor were interviewed and data were analysed for themes.

Results Analysts needed to reconcile the tension created by organisational mandates focused on the standardisation of EHR processes with the primary care teams’ demand for EHR customisation. They gained an understanding of health information technology (HIT) leadership’s and primary care team’s goals through attending meetings, reading meeting minutes and visiting with clinical teams. Within what was organisationally possible, EHR education could then be tailored to fit team needs. Major challenges were related to organisational attempts to standardise EHR use despite varied clinic contexts, personnel readiness and technical issues with the EHR platform. Forcing standardisation upon clinical needs that current EHR functionality could not satisfy was difficult.

Conclusions Dedicated optimisation analysts can add value to health systems through playing a mediating role between HIT leadership and care teams. Our findings imply that EHR optimisation should be performed with an in-depth understanding of the workflow, cognitive and interactional activities in primary care.


Keywords


computerised medical record systems; EHR acceptance; EHR optimisation; electronic health records/utilisation; primary care

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006;144(10):742–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. PMid:16702590.

Furukawa MF. Electronic medical records and efficiency and productivity during office visits. American Journal of Managed Care 2011;17(4):296–303. PMid:21615200.

Karsh BT. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009.

Romano MJ and Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Archives of Internal Medicine 2011;171(10):897–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archin-ternmed.2010.527. PMid:21263077; PMCid:PMC4016790.

Beasley JW, Holden RJ and Sullivan F. Electronic health records: research into design and implementation. British Journal of General Practice 2011;61(591):604–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/ bjgp11X601244. PMid:22152827; PMCid:PMC3177114.

Karsh BT, Weinger MB, Abbott PA and Wears RL. Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010;17(6):617–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.005637. PMid:20962121; PMCid:PMC3000760.

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Pub. L. No. 111-5 (Feb 17, 2009), codified at 42 U.S.C. 300jj et seq.; 17901 et seq., 111th Congress.

American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Osteopathic Association. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home, 2007.

AHRQ. Defining the PCMH. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Available from.

NCQA. Standards and Guidelines for Physician Practice Connections®—Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH™). Washington, D.C.: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2008.

Edsall R and Adler K. The 2012 EHR user satisfaction survey: responses from 3,088 family physicians. Family Practice Management 2012;19(6).

Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC and Cai B. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2011. NCHS Data Brief 2011(79):1–8.

Harrison JP and Palacio C. The role of clinical information systems in health care quality improvement. Health Care Management (Frederick) 2006;25(3):206–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200607000-00003

Taylor R, Bower A, Girosi F, Bigelow J, Fonkych K and Hillestad R. Promoting health information technology: is there a case for more-aggressive government action? Health Affairs (Project Hope) 2005;24(5):1234–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1234. PMid:16162568

Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Orav EJ, Bates DW et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16(4):457–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/ jamia.M3128. PMid:19390094; PMCid:PMC2705247.

Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Poon EG et al. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14(1):110–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2187. PMid:17068351; PMCid:PMC2215070.

Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, Ross TR, Tufano JT, Soman MP et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. American Journal of Managed Care 2009;15(9):e71–87.

Stream GR. Trends in adoption of electronic health records by family physicians in Washington State. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):145–52.

Yoon-Flannery K, Zandieh SO, Kuperman GJ, Langsam DJ, Hyman D and Kaushal R. A qualitative analysis of an electronic health record (EHR) implementation in an academic ambulatory setting. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):277–84.

McAlearney AS, Song PH, Robbins J, Hirsch A, Jorina M, Kowalczyk N et al. Moving from good to great in ambulatory electronic health record implementation. Journal for Healthcare Quality 2010;32(5):41–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00107.x. PMid:20854358.

Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, Campbell EG, Miralles PD and Jha AK. Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18(3):271–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000010. PMid:21486885; PMCid:PMC3078653.

Miller RH and Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2004;23(2):116–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116

Godfrey MM, Melin CN, Muething SE, Batalden PB and Nelson EC. Clinical microsystems, Part 3. Transformation of two hospitals using microsystem, mesosystem, and macrosystem strategies. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2008;34(10):591–603.

Ajami S and Arab-Chadegani R. Barriers to implement electronic health records (EHRs). Materia Socio Medica 2013;25(3):213–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2013.25.213-215. PMid:24167440; PMCid:PMC3804410.

Shachak A, Barnsley J, Montgomery C, Tu K, Jadad AR and Lemieux-Charles L. End-user support for a primary care electronic medical record: a qualitative case study of a vendor’s perspective. Informatics in Primary Care 2012;20(3):185–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i3.24. PMid:23710843.

Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Huber TP, Mohr JJ, Godfrey MM, Headrick LA et al. Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 2002;28(9):472–93. PMid:12216343.

Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Homa K, Godfrey MM, Campbell C, Headrick LA et al. Microsystems in health care: part 2. Creating a rich information environment. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(1):5–15. PMid:12528569.

Godfrey MM, Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Mohr JJ and Batalden PB. Microsystems in health care: part 3. Planning patient-centered services. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(4):159-70. PMid:12698806.

Wasson JH, Godfrey MM, Nelson EC, Mohr JJ and Batalden PB. Microsystems in health care: part 4. Planning patient-centered care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(5):227–37. PMid:12751303.

Batalden PB, Nelson EC, Mohr JJ, Godfrey MM, Huber TP, Kosnik L et al. Microsystems in health care: part 5. How leaders are leading. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(6):297–308. PMid:14564748.

Mohr JJ, Barach P, Cravero JP, Blike GT, Godfrey MM, Batalden PB et al. Microsystems in health care: part 6. Designing patient safety into the microsystem. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(8):401–8. PMid:12953604.

Kosnik LK and Espinosa JA. Microsystems in health care: part 7. The microsystem as a platform for merging strategic planning and operations. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(9):452–9. PMid:14513668.

Huber TP, Godfrey MM, Nelson EC, Mohr JJ, Campbell C and Batalden PB. Microsystems in health care: part 8. Developing people and improving work life: what front-line staff told us. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(10):512–22. PMid:14567260.

Batalden PB, Nelson EC, Edwards WH, Godfrey MM and Mohr JJ. Microsystems in health care: part 9. Developing small clinical units to attain peak performance. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2003;29(11):575–85. PMid:14619350.

QSR International. NVivo 9. Cambridge: MA, 2010.

Crabtree B and Miller W (Eds). Doing Qualitative Research: Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1999.

Walker JM and Carayon P. From tasks to processes: the case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 2009;28(2):467–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.467. PMid:19276006.

Rizzo JR, House RJ and Lirtzman SI. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 1970;15(2):150–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391486

Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Legare F, Lamothe L, Fortin JP et al. Implementation of an electronic medical record in family practice: a case study. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(1):31–40. PMid:20429976.

Cresswell K and Sheikh A. The NHS care record service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):153–60. PMid:20074427.

Beasley JW, Wetterneck TB, Temte J, Lapin JA, Smith P, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ et al. Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2011;24(6):745–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100255. PMid:22086819; PMCidv:PMC3286113.

Wetterneck TB, Lapin JA, Krueger DJ, Holman GT, Beasley JW and Karsh BT. Development of a primary care physician task list to evaluate clinic visit workflow. BMJ Quality & Safety 2012;21(1):47–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000067. PMid:21896667; PMCid:PMC3568931.

Kaushal R, Bates DW, Jenter CA, Mills SA, Volk LA, Burdick E et al. Imminent adopters of electronic health records in ambulatory care. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(1):7–15. PMid:19490768.

Menachemi N, Perkins RM, van Durme DJ and Brooks RG. Examining the adoption of electronic health records and personal digital assistants by family physicians in Florida. Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14(1):1–9. PMid:16848961.

Menachemi N. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are ‘imminent adopters’ and how do they differ from other physicians? Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14(2):101–8. PMid:17059699.

Linzer M, Gerrity M, Douglas JA, McMurray JE, Williams ES and Konrad TR. Physician stress: results from the physician worklife study. Stress and Health 2002;18(1):37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.917.

Lawler III EE. High Involvement Management: Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.

Zheng K, Haftel HM, Hirschl RB, O’Reilly M and Hanauer DA. Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010;17(4):454–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.004440. PMid:20595314; PMCid:PMC2995654.

Hess DR, Tokarczyk A, O’Malley M, Gavaghan S, Sullivan J and Schmidt U. The value of adding a verbal report to written handoffs on early readmission following prolonged respiratory failure. Chest 2010;138(6):1475–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2140. PMid:21138883.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i3.57

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT