Using the Internet as a source of information and support: a discussion paper on the risks and benefits for children and young people with long-term conditions

Jaqui Hewitt-Taylor

Abstract


Children and young people who have long-term conditions are likely to seek healthrelated information via the Internet. Because of their continuing contact with children with such conditions, primary care practitioners may be well placed to discuss with them and their families the risks and benefits of accessing information online. This includes not only the relative merits of particular sites but also more general online safety issues. To achieve this, it may be helpful for primary care practitioners to consider how they view risk in general, the risks associated with the Internet and the vulnerabilities of children and young people, particularly those with long-term conditions.


Keywords


children; Internet; long-term conditions; young people

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Bond CS. Nurses’ requirements for information technology: a challenge for educators. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2007;44:1075–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.009. PMid:17408671.

Hewitt-Taylor J and Bond CS. What e-patients want from the doctor–patient relationship. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2102;14(6):e155.

Moreno MA, Egan KG, Bare K, Henry N, Young HN and Cox ED. Internet safety education for youth: stakeholder perspectives. BMC Public Health 2103;13:543.

Forward C. Information and resources on Internet safety for children. British Journal of School Nursing 2014;9(3):147–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjsn.2014.9.3.147.

Dowell EB, Burgess AW and Cavanaugh DJ. Clustering of Internet risk behaviors in a middle school student population. Journal of School Health 2009;79(11):547–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00447.x. PMid:19840232.

Jones LM, Mitchell KJ and Finkelhor D. Online harassment in context: trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of Violence 2013;3(1):53–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030309.

Vandelanotte C, Sugiyama T, Gardiner P and Owen N. Associations of leisure-time internet and computer use with overweight and obesity, physical activity and sedentary behaviors: cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2009;11(3):e28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1084. PMid:19666455; PMCid:PMC2762849

de Lusignan S and Morris L. Giving patients online access to their records: opportunities, challenges, and scope for service transformation. British Journal of General Practice 2013;63(611):286–7. PMid:23735378; PMCid:PMC3662423.

Titterton M. Positive Risk Taking. HALE Series on Knowledge Transfer and Best Practice: Paper No. 2. 2010. Edinburgh: Hale.

Loxton J, Shirran A and Hothersall S. Risk. Hothersall S and Maas-Lowit M (Ed). Need, Risk and Protection in Social Work Practice. London: Learning Matters, 2010. Chapter 2, pp. 21–35.

Bhatt US, Newman DE, Carreras B and Dobson I. Understanding the effect of risk aversion on risk. 38th International Conference on System Science (Hawaii), 2005.

Sharland E. Young people, risk taking and risk making: some thoughts for social work. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2006;7(1):Article 23. Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/56/116. Accessed 19/4/14.

Laouris I, Aristodemou E and Fountana M. Teaching Internet safety in virtual environments. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 2011;7(1):67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/mcp.7.1.67_3.

Facer K. After the moral panic? Reframing the debate about child safety online. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 2012;33(3):397–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.681899.

Priebe G, Mitchell KJ and Finkelhor D. To tell or not to tell? Youth’s responses to unwanted Internet experiences. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 2013;7(1):Article 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-1-6.

Sandester EBH. Risky play and risk management in Norwegian preschools: a qualitative observational study. Safety Science Monitor 2009;13(1):2.

Floros G, Siomos K, Dafouli E, Fisoun V and Geroukalis D. Influence of parental attitudes towards Internet use on the employment of online safety measures at home. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 2012;64–70. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-121-2-64.

Vitalaki E and Anastasiades PS. Factors influencing parental control for the safe and pedagogical internet use among primary school students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 2012;42:125–35.

Woodman J, Hodson D, Gardner R, Cuthbert C, Woolley A, Allister J et al. The GP’s Role in Responding to Child Maltreatment. London: NSPCC, 2014.

Heaslip V. Understanding vulnerability. Heaslip V and Ryden J (Ed). Understanding Vulnerability: A Nursing and HealthCare Approach. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2013. Chapter 2, pp. 6–27.

Department of Health. The Children Act. London: HMSO, 2004.

Jones L, Bellis MA, Wood S, Hughes K, McCoy E, Eckley L et al. Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet 2012;380(9845): 899–907. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8.

Sellman D. Towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability. Nursing Philosophy 2005;6:2–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00202.x. PMid:15659085.

Huta V and Hawley L. Psychological strengths and cognitive vulnerabilities: are they two ends of the same continuum or do they have independent relationships with well-being and ill-being? Journal of Happiness Studies 2010;11:71–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9123-4.

Ball D, Gill T and Spiegal B. Managing Risk in Play Provision: Implementation Guide. Nottingham: The Play Safety Forum, 2008.

Scott R. The Health Benefits of Play and Physical Activity for Disabled Children and Young People. KIDS Briefing Paper. London: KIDS, 2010.

Heaslip V and Hewitt-Taylor J. Protecting children or creating vulnerability? Community Practitioner 2012;85(12):31–3. PMid:23304892.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v22i1.74

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT