Improving the measurement of longitudinal change in renal function: automated detection of changes in laboratory creatinine assay

Norman Poh, Andrew Peter McGovern, Simon de Lusignan



Renal function is reported using the estimates of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, eGFR values are recorded without reference to the particular serum creatinine (SCr) assays used to derive them, and newer assays were introduced at different time points across the laboratories in the United Kingdom. These changes may cause systematic bias in eGFR reported in routinely collected data, even though laboratory-reported eGFR values have a correction factor applied.


An algorithm to detect changes in SCr that in turn affect eGFR calculation method was developed. It compares the mapping of SCr values on to eGFR values across a time series of paired eGFR and SCr measurements.


Routinely collected primary care data from 20,000 people with the richest renal function data from the quality improvement in chronic kidney disease trial.


The algorithm identified a change in eGFR calculation method in 114 (90%) of the 127 included practices. This change was identified in 4736 (23.7%) patient time series analysed. This change in calibration method was found to cause a significant step change in the reported eGFR values, producing a systematic bias. The eGFR values could not be recalibrated by applying the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation to the laboratory reported SCr values.


This algorithm can identify laboratory changes in eGFR calculation methods and changes in SCr assay. Failure to account for these changes may misconstrue renal function changes over time. Researchers using routine eGFR data should account for these effects.




Primary Health Care; Informatics; Kidney Function Tests; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Creatinine

Full Text:



Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Research Reviews 2011;10(4):430–9. PMid:21402176.

Reutens AT. Epidemiology of diabetic kidney disease. Medical Clinics of North America 2013;97(1):1–18. Epub 2013/01/08. PMid:23290726.

McGovern AP, Rusholme B, Jones S, van Vlymen JN, Liyanage H, Gallagher H et al. Association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and failure to monitor renal function with adverse outcomes in people with diabetes: a primary care cohort study. BMC Nephrology 2013;14:198. Epub 2013/09/21. PMid:24047312 PMCid:PMC4015483.

de Lusignan S, Gallagher H, Jones S, Chan T, van Vlymen J, Tahir A et al. Audit-based education lowers systolic blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: the quality improvement in CKD (QICKD) trial results. Kidney International 2013;84(3): 609–20. Epub 2013/03/29. PMid:23536132 PMCid:PMC3778715.

Stevens PE, O’Donoghue DJ, de Lusignan S, Van Vlymen J, Klebe B, Middleton R et al. Chronic kidney disease management in the United Kingdom: NEOERICA project results. Kidney International 2007;72(1):92–9. PMid:17440495.

Kerr M, Bray B, Medcalf J, O’Donoghue DJ and Matthews B. Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2012;27 Suppl 3:iii73–80. Epub 2012/07/21. PMid:22815543 PMCid:PMC3484716.

Cockcroft DW and Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16(1):31–41. Epub 1976/01/01.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults in primary and secondary care: Clinical Guideline 732008. URL:

National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2002;39(2 Suppl 1):S1–266. Epub 2002/03/21. PMid:11904577.

Wargo KA and English TM. Evaluation of the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation for dosing antimicrobials. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2010;44(3):439–46. Epub 2010/02/19. PMid:20164470.

Jones GR. Estimating renal function for drug dosing decisions. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews 2011;32(2):81–8. Epub 2011/05/26. PMid:21611081 PMCid:PMC3100285.

Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N and Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999;130(6):461–70. Epub 1999/03/13. PMid:10075613.

Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003;139(2):137–47. Epub 2003/07/16. PMid:12859163.

Coresh J and Stevens LA. Kidney function estimating equations: where do we stand? Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 2006;15(3):276–84. Epub 2006/04/13. PMid:16609295.

Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ and Cosio FG. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004;141(12):929–37. Epub 2004/12/22. PMid:15611490.

Ibrahim H, Mondress M, Tello A, Fan Y, Koopmeiners J and Thomas W. An alternative formula to the Cockcroft–Gault and the modification of diet in renal diseases formulas in predicting GFR in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Journal of American Society of Nephrology 2005;16(4):1051–60. Epub 2005/02/18. PMid:15716336.

Poggio ED, Wang X, Greene T, Van Lente F and Hall PM. Performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft–Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease. Journal of American Society of Nephrology. 2005;16(2):459–66. Epub 2004/12/24. PMid:15615823.

Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009;150(9):604–12. Epub 2009/05/06. PMid:19414839 PMCid:PMC2763564.

Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Froissart M et al. Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2010;56(3):486–95. Epub 2010/06/19. PMid:20557989 PMCid:PMC2926290.

Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Coresh J, Manzi J, Landis R et al. Development and validation of GFR-estimating equations using diabetes, transplant and weight. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2010;25(2):449–57. Epub 2009/10/02. PMid:19793928 PMCid:PMC2910328.

Kilbride HS, Stevens PE, Eaglestone G, Knight S, Carter JL, Delaney MP et al. Accuracy of the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study and CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) equations for estimation of GFR in the elderly. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2013;61(1):57–66. Epub 2012/08/15. PMid:22889713.

Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Veys N, Verbeke F, Delanghe J, De Bacquer D et al. The importance of standardization of creatinine in the implementation of guidelines and recommendations for CKD: implications for CKD management programmes. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006;21(1):77–83. Epub 2005/10/14. PMid:16221704.

Vervoort G, Klein Gunnewiek JM, Willems HL and Wetzels JF. Effect of creatinine assay standardization on the performance of Cockcroft–Gault and MDRD formula in predicting GFR. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006;21(10):2998–9. Epub 2006/06/01. PMid:16735385.

Poh N, Rattani A and Roli F. Critical analysis of adaptive biometric systems. Biometrics 2012;1(4):179–87.

de Lusignan S, Gallagher H, Stevens P, Harris K and O’Donoghue D. Chronic kidney disease frequently asked questions, 2010. URL:

Carter JL, Stevens PE, Irving JE and Lamb EJ. Estimating glomerular filtration rate: comparison of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations in a large UK cohort with particular emphasis on the effect of age. QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians 2011;104(10):839–47. Epub 2011/06/10. PMid:21652537

de Lusignan S. Codes, classifications, terminologies and nomenclatures: definition, development and application in practice. Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13(1):65–70. Epub 2005/06/14. PMid:15949178.

Friedberg M, Hussey P and Schneider E. Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. Health Affairs 2010;29(5):766–72. PMid:20439859.

de Lusignan S, Gallagher H, Chan T, Thomas N, van Vlymen J, Nation M et al. The QICKD study protocol: a cluster randomised trial to compare quality improvement interventions to lower systolic BP in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care. Implementation Science 2009;4:39. PMid:19602233 PMCid:PMC2719588.

McDonald C, Huff S, deckard J, Holck K and Vreeman DJ. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) Users’ Guide. Regenstrief Institute; 2014 [Accessed: 02 Oct 2014]; URL:

Vatsa M, Singh R, Ross A and Noore A. Biometric classifier update using online learning: a case study in near infrared face verification. Image and Vision Computing 2010.

Didaci L, Marcialis GL and Roli F. A Theoretical And Experimental Analysis Of Template Co-Update In Biometric Verification Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Nyman HA, Dowling TC, Hudson JQ, Peter WL, Joy MS and Nolin TD. Comparative evaluation of the Cockcroft–Gault equation and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation for drug dosing: an opinion of the Nephrology Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Pharmacotherapy 2011;31(11):1130–44. Epub 2011/10/27. PMid:22026399.

Poh N and de Lusignan S. Data-modelling and visualisation in chronic kidney disease (CKD): a step towards personalised medicine. Informatics in Primary Care 2011;19(2):57–63. Epub 2011/01/01. PMid:22417815.

de Lusignan S. Flagging fasting plasma glucose specimens: time to routinely label the context in which pathology specimens are recorded. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(2):63–4. Epub 2009/10/08. PMid:19807947.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT