Establishing data-intensive healthcare: the case of Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration systems in Scotland

Kathrin Cresswell, Pam Smith, Charles Swainson, Angela Timoney, Aziz Sheikh

Abstract


Background Creating learning health systems, characterised by the use and repeated reuse of demographic, process and clinical data to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of care, is a key aim in realising the potential benefits and efficiency savings associated with the implementation of health information technology.

Objectives We sought to investigate stakeholder perspectives on and experiences of the implementation of hospital electronic prescribing and medicines administration (HEPMA) systems in Scotland and use these to inform political decisions on approaches to promoting the use and reuse of digitised prescribing and medication administration data in order to improve care processes and outcomes.

Methods We identified and recruited key national stakeholders involved in implementing and/or using HEPMA data from generic and specialty systems. These included representatives from healthcare settings (i.e. doctors, pharmacists and nurses), managers of existing national databases, policy makers, healthcare analytics companies, system suppliers and patient representatives. We conducted multi-disciplinary focus group discussions, audio-recorded these, transcribed data verbatim and thematically analysed the transcripts with the help of NVivo10. In analysing the data, we drew on theoretical and previous empirical work on information infrastructures.

Results We identified the following key themes: 1) micro-factors – usability of systems and motivating users to input data; 2) meso-factors – developing technical and organisational infrastructures to facilitate the aggregation of data; and 3) macro-factors – facilitating interoperability and data reuse at larger scales to ensure that data are effectively generated and used.

Conclusions This work is relevant not only to countries in the early stages of data strategy development but also to countries aiming to aggregate data at national levels. An overall shared vision of a learning health system at individual, organisational and national levels can help to catalyse such data-intensive transformational efforts.


Keywords


data strategy; health information technology; big data

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Institute of Medicine (US). Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care: Workshop Series Summary. Washington, DC:Institute of Medicine (US), 2011. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12912/digital-infrastructurefor-the-learning-health-system-the-foundation-for. Accessed 12 November 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.191.

Anderson GF and Hussey PS. Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. Health Affairs 2000;19:191–203.

Van Baal PH, Polder JJ, De Wit GA, Hoogenveen RT, Feenstra TL et al. Lifetime medical costs of obesity: prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure. PLoS Medicine 2008;5:e29.

Krumholz HM. Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system. Health Affairs 2014;33(7):1163–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053 PMid:25006142.

Schneeweiss S. Learning from big health care data. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;370:2161–2163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1401111. PMid:24897079

Cresswell K, Coleman J, Slee A, Williams R and Sheikh A. Investigating and learning lessons from early experiences of implementing ePrescribing systems into NHS hospitals: a questionnaire study. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e53369.

McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Handler SM, Dolovich LR, Holbrook AM, O’Reilly D et al. The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2012;19(1):22–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000304. PMid:21852412 PMCid:PMC3240758.

Beuscart-Zéphir MC, Pelayo S, Anceaux F, Meaux JJ, Degroisse M and Degoulet P. Impact of CPOE on doctor–nurse cooperation for the medication ordering and administration process. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005;74(7): 629–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.004. PMid:16043087.

Franklin BD, O’Grady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A and Barber N. The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16(4):279–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.019497. PMid:17693676 PMCid:PMC2464943.

Trist E. The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems. Occasional Paper, 1981.

Bijker WE. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT press, 1997.

Groves P, Kayyali B, Knott D and Van Kuiken S. The ‘Big Data’ Revolution in Healthcare. Seattle: McKinsey Quarterly, 2013.

NHS England. Good data strategy. Available from: http://www.england.nhs.uk/resources/resources-for-ccgs/good-data-strat. Accessed 12 November 2015.

Salzberg CA, Jang Y, Rozenblum R, Zimlichman E, Tamblyn R and Bates DW. Policy initiatives for health information technology: a qualitative study of US expectations and Canada’s experience. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012;81(10):713–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.007. PMid:22902272.

Riege A and Lindsay N. Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. Journal of Knowledge Management 2006;10(3):24–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270610670830.

Aarons GA, Wells RS, Zagursky K, Fettes DL and Palinkas LA. Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: a multiple stakeholder analysis. American Journal of Public Health 2009;99(11):2087–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.161711. PMid:19762654 PMCid:PMC2759812.

Williams C, Mostashari F, Mertz K, Hogin E and Atwal P. From the Office of the National Coordinator: the strategy for advancing the exchange of health information. Health Affairs 2012;31(3):527–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1314. PMid:22392663.

Eden KB, Totten AM, Kassakian SZ, Gorman PN, McDonagh MS, Devine B et al. Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2016;88:44–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004. PMid:26878761.

Shapiro JS, Crowley D, Hoxhaj S, Langabeer J II, Panik B, Taylor TB, et al. Health Information Exchange in Emergency Medicine. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2016;67(2):216–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.018. PMid:26233924.

Morgan DL. The Focus Group Guidebook (Vol. 1). California:Sage Publications, 1997.

Patton MQ. Qualitative Research. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2005.

Cresswell KM, Worth A and Sheikh A. Actor–Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2010;10(1):67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-67. PMid:21040575 PMCid:PMC2988706.

Biernacki P and Waldorf D. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research 1981;10:141–163.

CIS Oncology. Available from: http://www.cis-healthcare.com/latest/chemocare_goes_live_across_nhs_scotland. Accessed 14 October 2015.

Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal 1995;311:299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.

Emerson RM, Fretz RI and Shaw LL. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2011.

QSR International. NVivo 10 for Windows. Available from: http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx. Accessed 12 November 2015.

Fereday J and Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2008;5:80–92.

Hanseth O and Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology 2010;25:1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.19.

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM and Donaldson MS (Ed). To err is human: building a Safer Health System (Vol. 6). Washington, DC:National Academies Press, 2000.

Meeker D, Knight TK, Friedberg MW, Linder JA, Goldstein NJ, Fox CR et al. Nudging guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2014;174(3):425–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed. 2013.14191. PMid:24474434 PMCid:PMC4648560.

Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Medicine 2009;6:830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126. PMid:19688038 PMCid:PMC2719100.

The Farr Institute. The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research. Available from: http://www.farrinstitute.org. Accessed 12 October 2015.

Ciborra CU and Hanseth O. From tool to Gestell: Agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology & People 1998;11:305–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09593849810246129.

NHS England. Digital Maturity Index. Available from: http://www.england.nhs.uk/digitaltechnology/info-revolution/maturityindex. Accessed 12 October 2015.

McGinnis M, Olsen L and Goodby AW. Clinical Data as the Basic Staple of Health Learning: Creating and Protecting a Public Good: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC:National Academies Press, 2010.

The White House Names Dr. DJ Patil as the First U.S. Chief Data Scientist. Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/02/18/white-house-names-dr-dj-patil-first-uschief-data-scientist. Accessed 12 October 2015.

Electronic Health Record Incentive Program and Health IT Certification Program Final Rule. https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2015-Factsheets-items/2015-10-06.html. Accessed 12 October 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i3.842

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT