A simple clinical coding strategy to improve recording of child maltreatment concerns: an audit study

Andrew Peter McGovern, Jenny Woodman, Janice Allister, Jeremy van Vlymen, Harshana Liyanage, Simon Jones, Imran Rafi, Simon de Lusignan, Ruth Gilbert

Abstract


Background Recording concerns about child maltreatment, including minor concerns, is recommended by the General Medical Council (GMC) and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) but there is evidence of substantial under-recording.

Aim To determine whether a simple coding strategy improved recording of maltreatment-related concerns in electronic primary care records.

Design and Setting Clinical audit of rates of maltreatment-related coding before January 2010–December 2011 and after January–December 2012 implementation of a simple coding strategy in 11 English family practices. The strategy included encouraging general practitioners to use, always and as a minimum, the Read code ‘Child is cause for concern’. A total of 25,106 children aged 0–18 years were registered with these practices. We also undertook a qualitative service evaluation to investigate barriers to recording.

Method Outcomes were recording of 1) any maltreatment-related codes, 2) child protection proceedings and 3) child was a cause for concern.

Results We found increased recording of any maltreatment-related code (rate ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.6), child protection procedures (RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.6) and cause for concern (RR 2.5; 95% CI 1.8–3.4) after implementation of the coding strategy. Clinicians cited the simplicity of the coding strategy as the most important factor assisting implementation.

Conclusion This simple coding strategy improved clinician’s recording of maltreatment-related concerns in a small sample of practices with some ‘buy-in’. Further research should investigate how recording can best support the doctor–patient relationship

How this fits in Recording concerns about child maltreatment, including minor concerns, is recommended by the General Medical Council (GMC) and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), but there is evidence of substantial underrecording. We describe a simple clinical coding strategy that helped general practitioners to improve recording of maltreatment-related concerns. These improvements could improve case finding of children at risk and information sharing.


Keywords


child abuse; clinical audit; clinical coding; informatics; interdisciplinary communication

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Royal College of General Practitioners. Safeguarding Children & Young People: A Toolkit for General Practice 2011. Accessed: 03 Oct 2014. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/~/media/Files/CIRC/Safeguarding%20Children%20Module%20One/Safeguarding-Children-and-Young-People-Toolkit.ashx.

Woodman J, Freemantle N, Allister J, de Lusignan S, Gilbert R and Petersen I. Variation in recorded child maltreatment concerns in UK primary care records: a cohort study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. PLoS One 2012;7(11):e49808. Epub 2012/12/05. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049808. PMid:23209604; PMCid:PMC3509120. PMid:16702590.

Woodman J, Allister J, Rafi I, de Lusignan S, Belsey J, Petersen I et al. A simple approach to improve recording of concerns about child maltreatment in primary care records: developing a quality improvement intervention. The British journal of general practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2012;62(600):e478–86. Epub 2012/07/12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X652346. PMid:22781996; PMCid:PMC3381274.

Finkelhor D, Turner H, Ormrod R and Hamby SL. Violence, abuse, and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth. Pediatrics 2009;124(5):1411–23. Epub 2009/10/07. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0467. PMid:19805459.

Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E and Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet 2009;373(9657):68–81. Epub 2008/12/06. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7.

Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Woodman J, Copley L, van der Meulen J, Brandon M, Hodes D et al. Variation in recording of child maltreatment in administrative records of hospital admissions for injury in England, 1997-2009. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2010;95(11):918–25. Epub 2010/07/22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.180216. PMid:20647257.

Woodman J, Brandon M, Bailey S, Belderson P, Sidebotham P and Gilbert R. Healthcare use by children fatally or seriously harmed by child maltreatment: analysis of a national case series 2005-2007. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2011;96(3):270–5. Epub 2011/01/19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.190314. PMid:21242231.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. When to suspect child maltreatment (CG89)2009. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG89.

General Medical Council. Protecting Children and Young People: The Responsibilities of All Doctors, 2012.

Department for Education. Working together to safeguard children. 2013. Accessed: 03 Oct 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children.

Kumarapeli P and de Lusignan S. Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20(e1):e67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001081. Epub 2012/12/18.

Royal College of General Practitioners. Safeguarding children and young people: a toolkit for general practice, 2011. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/clinical-resources/child-and-adolescent-health/safeguarding-children-toolkit.aspx.

de Lusignan S. Codes, classifications, terminologies and nomenclatures: definition, development and application in practice. Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13(1):65–70. Epub 2005/06/14: PMid:15949178.

Woodman J, Gilbert R, Allister J, Glaser D and Brandon M. Responses to concerns about child maltreatment: a qualitative study of GPs in England. BMJ Open 2013;3(12):e003894. Epub 2013/12/05. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003894. PMid:24302506; PMCid:PMC3855649.

Haggerty JL, Roberge D, Freeman GK and Beaulieu C. Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple clinicians: a qualitative metasummary. Annals of Family Medicine 2013;11(3):262–71. Epub 2013/05/22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.1499. PMid:23690327; PMCid:PMC3659144.

de Lusignan S, Wells SE, Hague NJ and Thiru K. Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003;42(4):416–22. Epub 2003/10/10. PMid:14534643.

Canvin K, Jones C, Marttila A, Burstrom B and Whitehead M. Can I risk using public services? Perceived consequences of seeking help and health care among households living in poverty: qualitative study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61(11):984–9. Epub 2007/10/16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.058404. PMid:17933957; PMCid:PMC2465616.

Sayal K, Tischler V, Coope C, Robotham S, Ashworth M, Day C et al. Parental help-seeking in primary care for child and adolescent mental health concerns: qualitative study. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science 2010;197(6):476–81. Epub 2010/12/02. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.081448. PMid:21119154.

de Lusignan S, Morris L, Hassey A and Rafi I. Giving patients online access to their records: opportunities, challenges, and scope for service transformation. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2013;63(611):286–7. Epub 2013/06/06. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X668032. PMid:23735378, PMCid:PMC3662423.

National Research Ethics Service. Defining Research. 2009. Available from: http://nuhrise.org/wp-content/uploads/Defining-Research-Leaflet.pdf.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v22i1.93

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT