“How long does it take?” A mixed methods evaluation of computer-related work in GP consultations

James Hayward, Susan Buckingham, Fionagh Thomson, Heather Milne, Aziz Sheikh, Bernard Fernando, Kathrin Cresswell, Robin Williams, Hilary Pinnock

Abstract


Background Systematic reviews have suggested that time spent on computerrelated tasks increases consultation length. However, these reviews pre-date the current ubiquitous use of computers in U.K. general practice.

Objective As part of a U.K. national study of the influence of information technology (IT) on the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals during consultations, we explored how IT functions affected time allocation and styles of computer use during general practitioner (GP) consultations.

Methods We drew on multichannel video recording of consultations and measured consultation phases and the duration of computer-related tasks. We related measures of actual time to GP’s interpretation of computer use elicited in qualitative interviews.

Results Our sample included recordings of 112 consultations from 6 GPs in three practices. The computer was used for about one-third of the greater consultation. However, its use was concentrated pre- and post- the patient consultation. The workflow of consultation was exemplified through six computer use cases. Most functionality was accepted and accommodated within the consultation, though disruptive and time-consuming tasks were generally delegated to administrative staff. Recognised styles of computer use (minimal, block and conversational) were apparent, but applied very flexibly by GPs according to the nature of the consultation.

Conclusions In contrast to earlier reports, contemporary computer use does not appear to have lengthened consultations. GPs adopted different styles of computer use in different consultations, challenging classifications that seek to stereotype GP computer use. Designing systems that support this versatility require an understanding of the fluid application of computer use within consultation structure.


Keywords


Primary Care; Consultation; Information Technology; Computer use

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Car J, Anandan C, Black A, Cresswell K, Pagliari C, McKinstry B et al. The Impact of eHealth on the Quality & Safety of Healthcare - A Systematic Overview and Synthesis of the Literature. Report for the NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme. Birmingham: CFHEP, 2008.

Mitchell E and Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. British Medical Journal 2001;322:279–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279. PMid:11157532 PMCid:PMC26582.

Sullivan F and Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. British Medical Journal 1995;311:848–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7009.848. PMid:7580494 PMCid:PMC2550856.

Noordman J, Verhaak P, van Beljouw I and van Dulmen S. Consulting room computers and their effect on general practitioner-patient communication. Family Practice 2010;27:644–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq058. PMid:20660530.

Roland MO, Zander LI, Evans M, Morris R and Savage RA. Evaluation of a computer assisted repeat prescribing programme in a general practice. British Medical Journal 1985;291:456–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6493.456. PMid:3926236 PMCid:PMC1416301.

Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R and Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005;12:505–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1700. PMid:15905487 PMCid:PMC1205599.

Moulene MV, de Lusignan S, Freeman G, van Vlymen J, Sheeler I, Singleton A et al. Assessing the impact of recording quality target data on the GP consultation using multichannel video. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2007;12:1132–6.

Reddy M and Dourish P. A Finger on the Pulse: Temporal Rhythms and Information Seeking in Medical Work. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2002, pp. 344–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/587078.587126.

Pringle M, Robins S and Brown G. Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations. British Medical Journal 1986;293:20–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.293.6538.20. PMid:3089391 PMCid:PMC1340772.

Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, Honour MM, Gupta S, Wang S et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005;38:176–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009. PMid:15896691.

Richardson J, Ormerod T and Shepherd A. The role of task analysis in capturing requirements for interface design. Interacting with Computers 1998;9:367–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(97)00036-2.

Fowler M. UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Boston, MA; London: Addison Wesley Pearson Education, 2004.

Benson T. Prevention of errors and user alienation in health-care IT integration programmes. Informatics in Primary Care 2007;15:1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v15i1.639.

Kumarapeli P, de Lusignan S, Ellis T and Jones B. Unified modelling Language (UML) as a process-modelling technique for clinical-research process improvement. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2007;32:51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639230601097705. PMid:17365645.

Raghupathi W and Gao W. Exploring a UML profile approach to modeling web services in healthcare. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics 2007;2:36–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jhisi.2007040103.

Herzmark G, Brownbridge G, Fitter M and Evans A. Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1984;34:649–54. PMid:6512748.

Fitter MJ and Cruickshank PJ. The computer in the consulting room: a psychological framework. Behaviour and Information Technology 1982;1:81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449298208914438.

Pringle M, Robins S and Brown G. Computer assisted screening: effect on the patient and his consultation. British Medical Journal 1985;290:1709–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1709. PMid:3924226 PMCid:PMC1416093.

de Lusignan S, Kumarapeli P, Debar S, Kushniruk AW and Pearce C. Using an Open Source Observational Tool to Measure the Influence of the Doctor’s Consulting Style and the Computer System on the Outcomes of the Clinical Consultation. Adlassnig K-P et al. (Ed) Medical Informatics in a United and Healthy Europe. IOS Press, 2009, pp. 1017–22.

Pearce C, Walker H and O’Shea C. A visual study of computers on doctors’ desks. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16:111–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v16i2.682.

Rouf E, Whittle J, Lu N and Schwartz MD. Computers in the exam room: differences in physician–patient interaction may be due to physician experience. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007;22:43–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0112-9. PMid:17351838 PMCid:PMC1824776.

Chan WS, Stevenson M and McGlade K. Do general practitioners change how they use the computer during consultations with a significant psychological component? International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77:534–8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.005. PMid:18036885.

Bensing JM, Tromp F, van Dulmen S, van den Brink-Muinen A, Verheul W and Schellevis FG. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped general practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Family Practice 2006;7:62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-62. PMid:17064407 PMCid:PMC1630692.

Greatbatch D, Luff P, Heath C and Campion P. Interpersonal communication and human-computer interaction: an examination of the use of computers in medical consultations. Interacting Computers 1993;5:193–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(93)90018-O.

Pinnock H, Cresswell K, Fernando B, Huby G, Williams R, Sheikh A et al. Evaluation of the effect of IT on interactions between healthcare workers and patients Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme. Available from: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/mds/projects/HaPS/PHEB/CFHEP/reports/projects/010.aspx (accessed September 2014).

de Lusignan S, Kumarapeli P, Chan T, Pflug B, van Vlymen J, Jones B et al. The ALFA (Activity Log Files Aggregation) Toolkit: a method for precise observation of the consultation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008;10:e27.

Antam Software: Obswin (Observational Data Collection & Analysis). Available from: http://www.antam.co.uk/obswin.htm (accessed April 2015).

Kumarapeli P and de Lusignan S. Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20:e67–75.

Cockburn A. Writing Effective Use Cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Corporate, 2001.

Beyer M, Kuhn, K, Meiler C, Jablonski S and Lenz R. Towards a Flexible, Process Oriented IT Architecture for an Integrated Healthcare Network. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2004, pp. 264–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/967900.967958.

Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M, Stiles W and Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. The Journal of the American Medical Association 1997;277:350–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540280088045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.4.350. PMid:9002500.

Hayward J, Thomson F, Milne H, Buckingham S, Sheikh A, Fernando B et al. “Too much, too late”: mixed methods multichannel video recording study of computerised decision support systems and GP prescribing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20:e76–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001484. PMid:23470696 PMCid:PMC3715350.

Kurtz S, Silverman J, Benson J and Draper J. Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides. Academic Medicine 2003;78:802–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200308000-00011. PMid:12915371.

Cheek B. Calgary Cambridge: teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. 2011. Available from www.gp-training.net/training/communication_skills/calgary/index.htm (accessed September 2014).

Pearce C, Arnold M, Phillips C. Trumble S and Dwan K. The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18:138–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.006486. PMid:21262923 PMCid:PMC3116262.

Pearce C, Dwan K, Arnold M, Phillips C and Trumble S. Doctor, patient and computer - a framework for the new consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78:32–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.002. PMid:18752989.

Pearce C, Trumble S, Arnold M, Dwan K and Phillips C. Computers in the new consultation, within the first minute. Family Practice 2008;25:202–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn018. PMid:18504254.

Department of Health. “Choose & Book” – Patient’s Choice of Hospital and Booked Appointment. Policy Framework for Choice and Booking at the Point of Referral. London: DH, 2004.

Star SL and Ruhleder K. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research 1996;7:111–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111.

Eason KD, Dent M, Waterson PE and Tutt D. Bottom up and middle out approaches to electronic patient information systems: a focus on healthcare pathways. Informatics in Primary Care 2012;20:51–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i1.47. PMid:23336835.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v22i4.95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT