An instrument to identify computerised primary care research networks, genetic and disease registries prepared to conduct linked research: TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness (TIRRE) survey

Emily Jennings, Simon de Lusignan, Georgios Michalakidis, Paul Krause, Frank Sullivan, Harshana Liyanage, Brendan Delaney

Abstract


PURPOSE: The Translational Research and Patients safety in Europe (TRANSFoRm) project aims to integrate primary care with clinical research whilst improving patient safety. The TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness survey (TIRRE) aims to demonstrate data use through two linked data studies and by identifying clinical data repositories and genetic databases or disease registries prepared to participate in linked research.

METHOD: The TIRRE survey collects data at micro-, meso- and macro-levels of granularity; to fulfil data, study specific, business, geographical and readiness requirements of potential data providers for the TRANSFoRm demonstration studies. We used descriptive statistics to differentiate between demonstration-study compliant and non-compliant repositories. We only included surveys with >70% of questions answered in our final analysis, reporting the odds ratio (OR) of positive responses associated with a demonstration-study compliant data provider.

RESULTS: We contacted 531 organisations within the Eurpean Union (EU). Two declined to supply information; 56 made a valid response and a further 26 made a partial response. Of the 56 valid responses, 29 were databases of primary care data, 12 were genetic databases and 15 were cancer registries. The demonstration compliant primary care sites made 2098 positive responses compared with 268 in non-use-case compliant data sources [OR: 4.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.93–5.35, p < 0.008]; for genetic databases: 380:44 (OR: 6.13, 95% CI: 4.25–8.85, p < 0.008) and cancer registries: 553:44 (OR: 5.87, 95% CI: 4.13–8.34, p < 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS: TIRRE comprehensively assesses the preparedness of data repositories to participate in specific research projects. Multiple contacts about hypothetical participation in research identified few potential sites.


Keywords


Medical Informatics; Family practice; Medical records systems; Electronic health records; Diabetes mellitus; Barrett’s disease;

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Trifirò G, Coloma PM, Rijnbeek PR, Romio S, Mosseveld B, Weibel D, et al. Combining multiple healthcare databases for postmarketing drug and vaccine safety surveillance: why and how? Journal of Internal Medicine 2014;275(6):551–61.

Bohensky MA, Jolley D, Sundararajan V, Evans S, Pilcher DV, Scott I, et al. Data linkage: a powerful research tool with potential problems. BMC Health Services Research 2010;10:346.

Boyd JH, Randall SM, Ferrante AM, Bauer JK, Brown AP, Semmens JB. Technical challenges of providing record linkage services for research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2014;14:23.

van Panhuis WG, Paul P, Emerson C, Grefenstette J, Wilder R, Herbst AJ, et al. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1144.

de Lusignan S, Chan T. The development of primary care information technology in the United Kingdom. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2008;31(3):201–10.

de Lusignan S, van Weel, C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006;23(2):253–63.

Kellerman AL, Jones SS. What will it take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promise of health information technology? Health Affairs 2013;32(1):63–8.

Delaney BC, Curcin V, Andreasson A, Arvanitis TN, Bastiaens H, Corrigan D, et al. Translational medicine and patient safety in Europe: TRANSFoRm—architecture for the learning health system in Europe. BioMed Research International 2015;2015:961526. doi: 10.1155/2015/961526

Mastellos N, Bliźniuk G, Czopnik D, McGilchrist M, Misiaszek A, Bródka P, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of TRANSFoRm to improve clinical trial recruitment in primary care. Family Practice 2016;33(2):186–91.

Ethier JF, Curcin V, McGilchrist MM, Keung SNLC, Zhao L, Andreasson A, et al. eSource for clinical trials: implementation and evaluation of a standards-based approach in a real world trial. JMIR 2017;106:17–24.

European Union; Europe’s Information Society. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions-e-Health – making healthcare better for European citizens: an action plan for a European e-Health Area {SEC(2004)539}; 2004. Available from: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52004DC0356:EN:NOT

de Lusignan S, Krause P, Michalakidis G, Vicente MT, Thompson S, McGilchrist M, et al. Business process modelling is an essential part of a requirements analysis. Contribution of EFMI Primary Care Working Group. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2012;7(1):34–43.

Leppenwell E, de Lusignan S, Vicente MT, Michalakidis G, Krause P, Thompson S, et al. Developing a survey instrument to assess the readiness of primary care data, genetic and disease registries to conduct linked research: TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness (TIRRE) survey instrument. Informatics in Primary Care 2012;20(3):207–16.

de Lusignan S, Cashman J, Poh N, Michalakidis G, Mason A, Desombre T, et al. Conducting requirements analyses for research using routinely collected health data: a model driven approach. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2012;180:1105–7.

de Lusignan S, Pearce C, Shaw NT, Liaw ST, Michalakidis G, Vicente MT, Bainbridge M; International (IMIA); European (EFMI) Medical Informatics Association; Federation Primary Care Informatics Working Groups (PCI-WG). What are the barriers to conducting international research using routinely collected primary care data? Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2011;165:135–40.

de Lusignan S, Liaw ST, Krause P, Curcin V, Vicente MT, Michalakidis G, et al. Key concepts to assess the readiness of data for international research: data quality, lineage and provenance, extraction and processing errors, traceability, and curation. Contribution of the IMIA Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2011;6:112–20.

Dolin RH, Alschuler L. Approaching semantic interoperability in Health Level Seven. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18(1):99–103.

Michalakidis G, Kumarapeli P, Ring A, van Vlymen J, Krause P, de Lusignan S. A system for solution-orientated reporting of errors associated with the extraction of routinely collected clinical data for research. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2010;160:724–8.

Santos M, Bax M, Kalra D. Building a logical EHR architecture based on ISO 13606 standard and semantic web technologies. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2010;160(Pt 1):161–5.

International Classification of Diseases. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. Accessed 15 December 2018.

NHS Digital. Terminology and classifications. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/article/290/Terminology-and-Classifications. Accessed 15 December 2018.

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system (ATC). Available from: http://www.whocc.no/atc/structure_and_principles/. Accessed 15 December 2018.

Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC). Available from: http://www.cdisc.org. Accessed 15 December 2018.

Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG). Available from: http://www.cdisc.org/bridg. Accessed 15 December 2018.

Kousoulis AA, Rafi I, de Lusignan S. The CPRD and the RCGP: building on research success by enhancing benefits for patients and practices. British Journal of General Practice 2015;65(631):54–5.

Hippisley-Cox J, Stables D, Pringle M. QRESEARCH: a new general practice database for research. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12(1):49–50.

Blak BT, Thompson M, Dattani H, Bourke A. Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Informatics in Primary Care 2011;19(4):251–5.

ResearchOne Health and Care Database. Available from: http://www.researchone.org. Accessed 4 August 2018.

Correa A, Hinton W, McGovern A, van Vlymen J, Yonova I, Jones S, et al. Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre (RCGP RSC) sentinel network: a cohort profile. BMJ Open 2016;6(4):e011092.

McGovern A, Hinton W, Correa A, Munro N, Whyte M, de Lusignan S. Real-world evidence studies into treatment adherence, thresholds for intervention and disparities in treatment in people with type 2 diabetes in the UK. BMJ Open 2016;6(11):e012801.

Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J, Potts HW. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. BMJ 2010;340:c3111.

NHS Digital. GP Extraction Service. Available from: http://content.digital.nhs.uk/gpes. Accessed 15 December 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v25i4.964

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT