Automated conflict resolution between multiple clinical pathways: a technology report

Ian Litchfield, Alice Turner, Ruth Backman, João Bosco Ferreira Filho, Mark Lee

Abstract


Background: The number of people in the UK with three or more long-term conditions continues to grow and the management of patients with co-morbidities is complex. In treating patients with multimorbidities, a fundamental problem is understanding and detecting points of conflict between different guidelines which to date has relied on individual clinicians collating disparate information.

Objective: We will develop a framework for modelling a diverse set of care pathways, and investigate how conflicts can be detected and resolved automatically. We will use this knowledge to develop a software tool for use by clinicians that can map guidelines, highlight root causes of conflict between these guidelines and suggest ways they might be resolved.

Method: Our work consists of three phases. First, we will accurately model clinical pathways for six of the most common chronic diseases; second, we will automatically identify and detect sources of conflict across the pathways and howthey might be resolved. Third, we will present a case study to prove the validity of our approach using a team of clinicians to detect and resolve the conflicts in the treatment of a fictional patient with multiple common morbidities and compare their findings and recommendations with those derived automatically using our novel software.

Discussion: This paper describes the development of an important software-based method for identifying a conflict between clinical guidelines. Our findings will support clinicians treating patients with multimorbidity in both primary and secondary care settings.


Keywords


Computer Software Applications; multimorbidity; care pathways

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


DOH. Long Term Conditions Compendium of Information, 3rd edition [Internet]. Department of Health, 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216528/dh_134486.pdf/. Accessed September 2017.

NICE. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/. Accessed September 2017.

Kenning C, Fisher L, Bee P, Bower P and Coventry P. Primary care practitioner and patient understanding of the concepts of multimorbidity and self-management: a qualitative study. SAGE Open Medicine 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312113510001.

Hawley ST, Zikmund-Fisher B, Ubel P, Jancovic A, Lucas T and Fagerlin A. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;73(3):448–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.023. PMid:18755566.

Negrini S, Giovannoni S, Minozzi S, Barneschi G, Bonaiuti D, Bussotti A, et al. Diagnostic therapeutic flow-charts for low back pain patients: the Italian clinical guidelines. Europa Medicophysica 2006;42(2):151–70.

Object Management Group. UML Superstructure Specification, v.2.4.1 [Internet]. OMG 2011. Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Superstructure/PDF. Accessed September 2017.

Object Management Group. Business Process Model and Notation, v.2.0 [Internet]. OMG 2011. Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF. Accessed September 2017.

Reisig W. Understanding Petri Nets: Modeling Techniques, Analysis Methods, Case Studies. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33278-4.

Harel D and Kugler H. Synthesizing state-based object systems from LSC specifications. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 2002;13(1):5–51. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129054102000935.

Uchitel S, Kramer J and Magee J. Implied scenario detection in the presence of behaviour constraints. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 2002;65(7):65–84.

Ziadi T, Helouet L and Jezequel JM. Revisiting state chart synthesis with an algebraic approach. Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), IEEE Computer Society, Edinburgh, UK, 2004, pp. 242–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2004.1317446.

Araujo J, Whittle J and Kim D-K. Modelling and composing scenario-based requirements with aspects. Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE), IEEE Computer Society, Kyoto, Japan, 2004, pp. 58–67.

Bowles JKF, Bordbar B and Alwanain M. Weaving true-concurrent aspects using constraint solvers. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD 2016), IEEE, Torun, Poland, 19–24 June 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2016.19.

Prasad M, Biere A and Gupta A. A survey of recent advances in SAT-based formal verification. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 2005;7(2):156–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-004-0183-4.

Nethercote N, Stuckey P, Becket R, Brand S, Duck G and Tack G. MiniZinc: towards a standard CP modelling language. In: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming—CP 2007. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007, pp. 529–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74970-7_38.

Gent IP, Jefferson C and Miguel I. Minion: a fast, scalable, constraint solver. Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). Riva del Garda, Italy: IOS Press, 2006, pp. 98–102.

de Moura LM and Bjørner N. Z3: an efficient SMT solver. Proceedings of Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS), Springer, Budapest, Hungary, 2008, pp. 337–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24.

Rubin J, Chechik M and Easterbrook S. Declarative approach for model composition. Proceedings of International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MISE), ACM, Leipzig, Germany, 2008, pp. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1370731.1370734.

Bowles JKF and Bordbar B. A formal model for integrating multiple views. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD), IEEE Computer Society, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2007, pp. 71–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2007.39.

Zhang D, Li S and Liu X. An approach for model composition and verification. Proceedings of International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management (NCM), IEEE Computer Society, Seoul, Korea, 2009, pp. 1102–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/NCM.2009.271.

Bowles JKF, Bordbar B and Alwanain M. A logical approach for behavioural composition of scenario-based models. Formal methods and software engineering. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods, ICFEM 2015, Paris, France, 3–5 November 2015, pp. 252–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25423-4_16.

Baxter GD, Kuster-Filipe J, Miguel A and Tan K. The effects of timing and collaboration on dependability in the neonatal intensive care unit. In: Constituents of Modern System-safety Thinking. Redmill F and Anderson T (Eds). London, UK: Springer, 2005, pp. 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-130-X_13. PMid:16137245.

Burns A and Hayes IJ. A time band framework for modelling real-time systems. Real-Time Systems 2010;45(1):106–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11241-010-9094-5.

Jensen K and Kristensen LM. Coloured Petri Nets—Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/b95112.

Weber P, Bordbar B, Tiňo P and Majeed B. A framework for comparing process mining algorithms. 2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC), 2011 IEEE GCC, 2011, pp. 625–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEEGCC.2011.5752616.

Müller R and Rogge-Solti A. BPMN for healthcare processes. Proceedings of 3rd Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition, Services und ihre Komposition, ZEUS 2011, Karlsruhe, Germany, CEUR-WS.org, 2011, pp. 65–72.

Rojo MG, Rolón E, Calahorra L, Garcı́a FO, Sánchez RP, Ruiz F, et al. Implementation of the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) in the modelling of anatomic pathology processes. Diagnostic Pathology 2008;3(Suppl 1):S22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-3-S1-S22. PMid:18673511; PMCid:PMC2500103.

Casati F, Ceri S, Pernici B and Pozzi G. Conceptual modelling of workflows. Proceedings of OOER’95: Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modelling, 14th International Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, LNCS, Springer, 1995, pp. 341–54.

van der Aalst WMP. The application of Petri nets to workflow management. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 1998;8(1):21–66. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126698000043.

Microsoft. Z3 Solver [Internet]. Microsoft, 2012. Available from: https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3. Accessed September 2017.

Bowles J and Caminati MB. Correct composition of dephased behavioural models. In: Proença J, Lumpe M (Eds.), Formal Aspects of Component Software. FACS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10487. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 233–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68034-7_14.

Gao X, Xiao B, Tao D and Li X. A survey of graph edit distance. Pattern Analysis and Applications 2010;13(1):113–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-008-0141-y.

Boyd C, Darer J, Boult C, Fried L, Boult L and Wu A. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005;294(6):716–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.6.716. PMid:16091574.

Devlin RA, Hogg W, Zhong J, Shortt M, Dahrouge S and Russell G. Practice size, financial sharing and quality of care. BMC Health Services Research 2013;13:446. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-446. PMid:24165413; PMCid:PMC3819507.

Kaffash J. Seven in ten GPs ignore NICE guidance once a month, Pulse Magazine. 2015. Available from: http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/clinical-news/seven-in-ten-gps-ignore-nice-guidance-at-least-once-a-month/20009357.article

International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 19510:2013 Information technology—Object Management Group Business Process Model and Notation, 2013.

Scheuerlein H, Rauchfuss F, Dittmar Y, Molle R, Lehmann T, Pienkos N, et al. New methods for clinical pathways—Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) and Tangible Business Process Podeling (t.BPM). Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 2012;397(5):755–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0914-z. PMid:22362053.

Ruiz F, Garcia F, Calahorra L, Llorente C, Gonçalves L, Daniel C, et al. Business process modeling in healthcare. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2012;179:75–87.

Braun R, Schlieter H, Burwitz M and Esswein W. BPMN4CP: design and implementation of a BPMN extension for clinical pathways. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) IEEE Computer Society, Belfast, UK, 2014, pp. 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2014.6999261.

Rolón E, Aguilar ER, García F, Ruiz F, Piattini M, Calahorra L, et al. Process modeling of the health sector using BPMN: a case study. Proceedings of First International Conference on Health Informatics, HEALTHINF 2008, Vol. 2, Funchal, Portugal, 2008, pp. 173–8.

Stroppi L, Chiotti O and Villareal P. Extending BPMN 2.0: method and tool support. LNBIP 2011;95:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3_5.

Kossak F, Illibauer C, Geist V, Kubovy J, Natschlager C, Ziebermayr T, et al. A Rigorous Semantics for BPMN 2.0 Process Diagrams. Cham; Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09931-6.

Van Gorp P and Dijkman RM. A visual token-based formalization of BPMN, 2.0 based on in-place transformations. Information and Software Technology 2013;55(2):365–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.08.014.

Murata T. Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989;77(4):541–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.24143.

van der Aalst WMP and ter Hofstede AHM. YAWL: yet another workflow language. Information Systems Journal 2005;30(4):245–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2004.02.002.

Amirkhani A, Papageorgiou E, Mohseni A and Moosavi M. A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine: taxonomy, methods and applications. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2017; 142: 129–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.02.021. PMid:28325441.

Map and Steer Complex Systems: A project powered by ERIE to aid decision making and intervention design in complex contexts, Available from: http://cctool.herokuapp.com/. Accessed February 2018.

Taplin DH and Clark H. Theory of Change Basics. New York, NY: ACT Knowledge, 2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v25i3.986

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal starting from Volume 21 without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open accessFor permission regarding papers published in previous volumes, please contact us.

Privacy statement: The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Online ISSN 2058-4563 - Print ISSN 2058-4555. Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT